seodraft

GEO is not a second SEO

Answer engines cite pages for the same reasons search engines rank them. What changes is the unit they quote, not the work.

Every few months a new acronym arrives and the advice is the same: rewrite everything. GEO — getting cited by answer engines — is the current one.

The unit changed, not the job

A search engine ranks a page. An answer engine quotes a passage. So the page still has to be worth ranking, it just also has to contain sentences that survive being lifted out of it.

That is a formatting concern, not a strategy concern:

  • Answer the question in the first sentence of the section.
  • Keep the claim and its evidence in the same paragraph.
  • Put numbers in the sentence, not only in a chart.

What does not work

Stuffing an FAQ block at the bottom of a thin page. Answer engines are reading the same page a reader would; a page nobody would quote does not get quoted.

This post has no Spanish translation

Deliberately. It is here so the blog can prove that a post existing in one language only still emits honest hreflang — it advertises English and nothing else, instead of pointing at a Spanish URL that would 404.

All posts
GEO is not a second SEO